IQnomics

Subscriptions

Is a subscription worth more than paying per use?

Pick a plan to see what we know about it: its price, the provider's published limits, and, where we have tested it, what the same work would have cost on the pay-per-use API.

Only two plans have a usage test so far, both from October 20, 2026. The rest show published limits, which are not a dollar amount.

Pick a provider

IQnomicssubscription vs usage receipt
Plan
Claude Max 20x · October 20 historical sample
Monthly price
$200 historical fee assumption

Historical what-if · October 20, 2026 UTC
Not a current allowance.

Projected API-equivalent per week

≈ $2,577.44

Recorded work scaled to a full weekly meter; not measured full-week capacity.

$2,061.95–$3,436.59 · meter rounding only.

How this estimate works

20 Oct 2026 UTC sample, repriced at 4 Nov standard short-context API rates. Scaled from logged usage and a rounded meter, assuming all meter movement belongs to the logged work and the same workload remains repeatable. Outside usage and meter weighting are unverified. Not measured full-week capacity or current-plan value. Range covers rounding only.

Mixed Opus/Haiku and cache-heavy work; recovered known gap usage, but browser/cloud and other-project usage may be missing. Historical Max 20x only.

Oct 20, 2026, 01:27 UTC to Oct 20, 2026, 02:28 UTC.

Logged work priced at approximately $103.10 using the 4 November tariff. Meter: 3 → 7 (4 percentage points).

The $200.00 monthly fee is the historical test-plan assumption, not a verified invoice.

API-equivalent use is the cost of the same work at usage-based prices, not cash credits or a guaranteed allowance.

Fee shown is the historical test-plan price. API tariffs checked 2026-11-04. How we compare.